Introduction: It was first
conceptualized by Friedrich Engels in the mid-19th century. Engels
observed that the population of Manchester, England in 884 was residentially
segregated on the basis of class. The preceding three theories of urban spatial
structure apply only primarily to the cities of the MDCs .Many cities in the
LDC follow different patterns rather than the preceding theories. Inverse
Concentric Zone pattern is the reversal of the concentric zone model and one of
the frequent pattern applicable in the cities of the LDCs. In cities of LDC,
the central area is the place of residence of the elite class. The poor live on
the periphery. Unlike most cities in the MDCs, social class in these places is
inversely related to distance from the center of the city.
Explanation
It is the reversal of the concentric
zone model which means instead of the rich moving away from central city, poor
are moving away from central city. Social status is related to distance from
center of the city and declines with increasing distance from the center.
Reason for this pattern:
a.
Lack of an adequate and
dependable transportation system has restricted the elites to the center of the
city so they have to close to their places of work.
b.
Functions of the city
primarily administrative and religious/ cultural are controlled by the elite
and are concentrated in the center of the city.
As many of the LDCs have begun to industrialize especially in
the past 30 years, industrial growth have been primarily oriented in the cities
center just as they were in the MDCs many decades ago. But, the newer and
larger industrial establishments tend to locate not in the city centers but on
the periphery often in industrial peaks or enterprises zones established by the
government for the purpose of attracting both domestic and foreign investors
because:
a.
City centers tend to be crowded
for industrial plants.
b.
Elites in the city
centers often do not wan large industrial plants near their place of work and
residence.
0 Reviews:
Post a Comment